Bill Clintons speech drafts for the DNC

If only we could see Clinton's rough drafts!

Why does the Left praise wealth in Hollywood, or Democratic wealth, but demonize any Republicans with more then $100 in their wallet? You can't be against only SOME wealth! Either you admire anyone who has made something of themselves, or you sell all your worldy posessions and renounce material things! I don't see a lot of in between. Quit being hypocrits Liberal Democrats! Morgan Freeman doesn't have a company that employs 3,000 people! Lets not bash the job creators.

Nice budget Democrats .... NOT!

Not only has have the Democrats in the Senate not passed a budget to try and justify their drunken spending spree ... but Harry Reid doesn't even think he should (Harry Reid shuts down budget process)... they feel like they can spend whatever they want and they don't feel the need to let you piss ant, ignorant voters know what is going on! Vote them ALL out in november!

Evil Corporate CEOs

     It gets really tedious to hear Liberals bashing the Capitalist system and pointing to a few greedy CEOs as their example for why it is an evil system. I could go on a long rant about how much Capitalism has built in this country, but as you folks out there read this on your Dell or Apple computer, sip your Starbucks, drive your Fords, text on your iPhones, and go to sleep on your Sealy Mattress, you know what I mean. 

    The one thing I cannot understand, and I will leave you with this question, if most Liberals are so against the Capitalist system, why do they have zero issues enjoying the fruits of those labors? What I mean is, I don't see many large communes of Liberals living "off the grid" and shunning all the nice luxuries born of Capitalism. You mean to tell me Liberals don't buy Apple products and take their kids to Disney? 

    You can't have it both ways Lefties ... you can't rail against "evil" capitalism and then use their products. If you all start your own commune, use nothing from an evil corporation, and then tell me I am wrong ... then we can talk. Until then keep your hypocrisy to yourself.

Young Deadbeats

Good job Obama ... those healthy, young people were the drain on our healthcare system, way to weed them out! Hell, Healthcare rates may get so cheap now I may buy TWO policies!!

I'll give you all a Unicorn!

       

    Obama came out for Gays, without really doing anything for them, and they LOVED him. He comes out for illegals without any authority to do anything for them, and they LOVE him for it. He has spent nearly four years doing nothing to help this country and especially this economy and people still LOVE him ... I am missing something? If promising stuff you don't have to actually make happen is all it takes to get elected these days, I am announcing my candidacy for Emperor of the Universe! Free money and inter-galactic spaceships for all!!

Government Role in Job Creation

    With the race for President heating up between Romney and Obama, the issue of jobs is being pushed to the forefront. Obama's camp argues that we are slowly adding jobs and crowing that their policies have made it happen. Meanwhile Romney supporters point to his time in the private sector and Bain Capitol lauding his experience in creating not only wealth, but saving and growing companies (and therefore jobs).
    Is there truth in both camps? Lets take the Obama folks ... all the money spent in the last four years has saved some jobs. But the big question is, is throwing money at a company or even a state or town really "creating jobs?" If you give a million dollars to a state so they now have the money to save teacher jobs, is that creation? In a year or so when the grant runs out, the state may very well be in the same situation of needing to lay off teachers, so did you create anything? Using the White Houses' own numbers, it has been shown that this "job growth" has cost taxpayers $287,000 per job! As cited in the article, you could have sent a $100,000 check to everyone who owes their job to the stimulus and we still could have come out ahead!

     I will take that one step further ... imagine if you had given 2.4 million small business owners a check (2.4 million being the estimated number of jobs saved) for that $287,000. How many jobs would that have created? As a small business owner I can tell you I could probably hire 5-7 people for a year with that money! 

    Lets estimate low and say I only hire 3 and use the rest for capitol investments (which still helps the economy). That would mean now over 7.2 million people are employed for the same amount of money the government threw away to create a mere 2.4 million the "government way."

    Now take into account that these jobs are in small business where most job creation naturally happens so the chances of a good chunk of these jobs lasting after the government money runs out is far greater then in the public sector. 

    Obama claims the economic recovery has been slowed by the Republicans blocking of his new jobs bill. Secretary Geithner hasn't denied the price tag of this new jobs bill is $200,000 per job (admittedly a discount from their spending so far, but still pretty steep.) Obama Jobs Bill Costs? So again is throwing money for temporary fixes really job growth? Is it possible the Obama folks know this but are hoping the short term boost will help the re-election? Spend it all now and figure out how to pay for it all later is getting to be too common a theme in government and that needs to stop.

    So what about Romney, he has more experience in business there is no doubt, but is that helpful in job creation if he gets to be President? Lets look at some of his proposals.    http://www.mittromney.com/jobs 

    It seems that Romney gets it better then the Democrats that the best way for Government to "create" jobs is to not try to create them at all, but to simply create an environment for the private sector to create jobs and get the hell out of the way. Some would argue that that is what led to the banking crisis ... lack of regulation, and they would have a point. But I also believe in true Capitalism where the government doesn't pick winners. I lean more towards Ron Paul's views (http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul486.html) that there is no such thing as "too big too fail." I think government shouldn't bail out bad business decisions, or bail out car companies that are overburdened with Union obligations. 

    Where Romney stands on bail-out seems still up for debate ... but either way, I think job creation is not up to the government and until a true fiscal Conservative can be elected, we will have to make due with Romney.